10 Feb 2026

Security Guards Overwhelmingly Vote to Remove SPFPA Union Officials from Vogtle Nuclear Power Plant

Posted in News Releases

Guards avoid runoff with clear vote to reject two different unions

Waynesboro, GA (February 10, 2026) – Security guards working for Southern Nuclear Operating Company have freed themselves from the control of Security, Police and Fire Professionals of America (SPFPA) union officials in their workplace. The guards, who in January filed a petition seeking a “union decertification vote” with free assistance from National Right to Work Foundation staff attorneys, work at Plant Vogtle, a major nuclear power plant in Waynesboro, Georgia.

In a vote conducted by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), a majority of voting security guards decided against having any union at all in their workplace, rejecting both the SPFPA and a rival union that was trying to work its way into power. By voting overwhelmingly to reject union “representation,” the guards avoided a runoff election and sent a clear message in favor of their individual freedom.

The NLRB is the federal agency responsible for enforcing federal labor law, a task that includes administering votes to install (or “certify”) and remove (or “decertify”) unions in workplaces. Under NLRB rules, the Board should administer a decertification election if employees submit a petition in which at least 30% of workers in a work unit demand such an election.

Security Guards Restore Individual Freedom in Their Workplace

Georgia is a Right to Work state, meaning that SPFPA officials could not enforce union contracts that require workers to pay union dues or fees to keep their jobs. Now, the nearly 250 security guards at the power plant are also free from SFPFA’s exclusive “representation,” a power used by union officials to impose restrictive, one-size-fits-all contracts on every employee in a workplace, even those who don’t support the union.

The Foundation has seen unprecedented levels of worker-backed decertification efforts in the wake of the radical, pro-Big Labor policies instituted by the Biden Administration. There were several successful decertification efforts in 2025 involving the Teamsters, the Operating Engineers, the International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, and the Service Employees International Union. This successful effort continues this trend into 2026.

“Contrary to union boss propaganda, workers all across America desire to make a living independent of union rules and strictures. Plant Vogtle security guards have just joined the vast majority of American workers who are not under union control and have no ambitions to join a union,” said National Right to Work Foundation President Mark Mix. “While Georgia’s Right to Work law guards employees from the forced-dues demands of union officials, no worker should be forced under the control of union chiefs who are self-interested or simply aren’t doing a good job.”

10 Jul 2023

UPDATE: Federal Charges Against URSO Union and MTAC, Inc. for Termination of D.C. Security Guard Still Pending After Deauthorization Vote

Posted in News Releases

New NLRB filing details numerous issues with workers’ election to strip union officials of forced dues powers

Washington, D.C. (September 15, 2023) – A pair of federal unfair labor practice charges filed with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) by MTAC security guard Benson Sebuabe remain pending with the NLRB. According to the charges, Benson was illegally terminated from MTAC at the behest of union officials in violation of his rights.

The July charges against MTAC and the self-described “Union Rights for Security Officers” (URSO) union are part of a legal dispute over forced union dues at Sebuabe’s workplace. As part of that dispute, on June 5, 2023, Sebuabe filed a deauthorization petition that contained more than enough signatures from his coworkers to trigger an employee vote.

In the petition, MTAC employees seek to strip union officials of their authority to have workers fired for refusing to pay union dues or fees. The vote was conducted via mail ballot over several weeks in August and September. However, when the NLRB announced the results of the vote, it claimed no ballots were received.

That “0-0” vote tally outcome would, if certified, leave URSO officials with the legal authority to force workers to pay up or be fired. In response to the NLRB’s vote tally announcement, Sebuabe’s attorneys have filed objections to the election results citing numerous issues.

The September 13, 2023, filing questions how no ballots were received from workers in light of Sebuabe returning his ballot well ahead of the deadline. The objections also claim union and employer actions violated NLRB standards during the critical period around the vote. Among other things, Sebuabe’s objections note the failure of the employer to provide proper voter lists on time as required by NLRB procedures.

Other objections include the impact created by MTAC’s termination of two supporters of the deauthorization effort. This includes not only the termination of Sebuabe, which is the subject of pending NLRB unfair labor practice charges against both URSO and MTAC, but also the termination of another supporter of the deauthorization petition.

Sebuabe is receiving free legal representation from Foundation staff attorneys both with the exercise of his rights to petition for a vote to “deauthorize” the union officials’ power  to require workers to pay dues or be fired, and his unfair labor practice charges against the URSO union and MTAC.

URSO had demanded that MTAC discharge Sebuabe for not paying dues or fees under a forced fee clause. USRO threatened Sebuabe with discharge for not paying compulsory dues and fees before Sebuabe filed his deauthorization petition and demanded his discharge for not making those compulsory payments after he filed the petition.

Sebuabe’s charges allege, among other things, that MTAC and URSO failed to honor Sebuabe’s rights under the U.S. Supreme Court’s CWA v. Beck precedent regarding procedural requirements that union officials must follow if they seek to enforce a mandatory dues requirement. The ULP charges remain pending with the NLRB.

###

NOTE: This article updates and replaces a version that first appeared in July reporting on the initial filing of Sebuabe’s NLRB unfair labor practice charges. This article clarifies that Sebuabe’s charge against the URSO union not only alleges his termination was retaliation for supporting the deauthorization effort, but also alleges that his termination was illegal because URSO failed to follow the necessary procedural requirements under the Supreme Court’s CWA v. Beck decision.

1 May 2021

Las Vegas Security Guards Win $4,200 in Case Challenging Illegal Dues Seizures

The following article is from the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation’s bi-monthly Foundation Action Newsletter, January/February 2021 edition. To view other editions or to sign up for a free subscription, click here.

SPFPA officials rushed monopoly bargaining contract in attempt to trap workers in forced dues

Las Vegas security guards

“You can stand up to the union and not fail and not have fear of retaliation,” security guard Justin Stephens told the Las Vegas Review-Journal about his and his coworkers’ victory.

LAS VEGAS, NV – Dozens of Las Vegas security guards employed by North American Security won a settlement last October against the Security, Police & Fire Professionals of America (SPFPA) union, which they had charged in April with illegally seizing dues from their paychecks. The guards received free legal aid from the National Right to Work Foundation.

SPFPA union officials must now refund more than $4,200 to the security guards, whose timely requests to resign from union membership and cease dues deductions were wrongfully rejected by union officials who hastily extended their monopoly bargaining agreement with the guards’ employer.

Union Officials Secretly Struck Contract after Guards Voiced Dissatisfaction

According to guard Justin Stephens’ April 2020 charge filed at Region 28 of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) in Phoenix, SPFPA officials extended the bargaining contract with North American Security on January 31, 2020. The extension occurred one day after Stephens and the vast majority of his fellow employees at the federal courthouse in Las Vegas sent letters to the union stating that they no longer wanted it as the monopoly bargaining agent in their workplace.

The charge explained that Stephens later submitted a batch of letters to SPFPA officials in which he and his fellow employees tried to exercise their rights to resign union membership and stop dues deductions from their paychecks. These letters were sent within what the employees believed to be the contract’s window for exercising their right to cut off dues payments.

However, the charge asserted, the union “did not acknowledge the timely revocation the employees made on the anniversary” of the contract, ostensibly because the union officials’ hurried contract extension eliminated any opportunity for employees to cut off union dues before the existing contract’s March 31 expiration.

SPFPA bosses kept collecting full union dues “from all non-member bargaining unit employees” in violation of their right under the National Labor Relations Act to refrain from union activities and support, according to the charge. Stephens’ charge also asserted that the union’s sudden extension of the monopoly bargaining contract after the workers notified the union about their opposition amounted to “an apparent attempt to avoid a decertification” vote to remove the union.

Because Nevada has enacted Right to Work protections for employees, union bosses are additionally forbidden by state law from requiring any employee to join or pay dues or fees to a union as a condition of employment.

The settlement requires SPFPA officials to process any timely resignations by security guards and notify North American Security to cease dues deductions from those whose resignations they have already processed.

Foundation Wins Refunds of Unlawful Dues Seized from Dozens of Guards

SPFPA bosses must also return all dues seized from Stephens’ and his coworkers’ paychecks in violation of their rights. In the future, the settlement stipulates, union officials must always “accept and timely process” resignations and requests to cut off dues.

“I want people to see this and see that it’s possible,” Stephens told the Las Vegas Review-Journal in a story about his case. “You can stand up to the union and not fail and not have fear of retaliation.”

“It’s good news that Mr. Stephens and his hardworking colleagues have gotten back dues that were illegally taken from them by SPFPA union bosses who have demonstrated they are more interested in stuffing their coffers with union dues than respecting the wishes of the rank-and-file workers they claim to ‘represent,’” commented National Right to Work Foundation Vice President and Legal Director Raymond LeJeunesse. “This type of legal trickery used by union bosses to stay in power despite the objections of most workers shows why the NLRB should eliminate its numerous policies that block workers from removing an unwanted union.”

“Ultimately, the root of this problem is the federal labor law which grants union bosses monopoly bargaining powers, allowing them to force their so-called ‘representation’ on workers who don’t want it and believe they would be better off without it,” added LaJeunesse.

“You can stand up to the union and not fail and not have fear of retaliation,” security guard Justin Stephens told the Las Vegas Review-Journal about his and his coworkers’ victory.