“Streamlining” Union Intimidation 

Last week, blogger Clayton Cramer gave his take on why Big Labor bosses would want to wipe out secret ballot elections from the American workplace. His account includes some telling examples of union boss intimidation:

I am more inclined to suspect that a lot of people sign the union authorization cards because they are either strongly encouraged or even directly threatened to do so. Labor unions are fundamentally institutions of organized violence. A friend who has since passed on left me this account of working in a union shop in California during World War II (when the federal government leaned pretty heavily on employers to accept unions):

Our next problem was that after three months on the job, workers were required to join the paper workers union. Those who did not received disfiguring beatings after hours. Having seen what happened to another girl in same position as Wanda and I, we decided that rather than face the same treatment we would quit our jobs before the three months ended.

I remember being quite young and surprised that my father was home during the day. He explained that his union, the Boilermakers/Blacksmiths, had gone on strike. "Can't you go to work anyway?"

"Not if you want to live."

And unfortunately, this wasn't just his imagination. There's a fascinating decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, U.S. v. Enmons (1973), that held that the Hobbs Act that "makes it a federal crime to obstruct interstate commerce by robbery or extortion" did not apply to labor unions engaged in destroying power company transformers with rifles and explosives because such use of violence did not qualify as extortion.
Extortion means that you are getting something that you don't have a right to get--while higher wages obtained through such violence was a legitimate union bargaining tactic. The Court may have actually come to the right conclusion, based on the legal definition of extortion and the legislative intent of the Hobbs Act--but it does show you something of how labor unions get things done.

I had a friend in California who grew up in Michigan. His father was a UAW local official. He remembered vividly being in a coffee shop with his family one day. The guy in the next booth made some remark to a companion that was uncomplimentary to the union--and my friend's father instinctively swung his coffee mug around and shattered it on this guy's jaw.

There's a long and ugly, bloody, deadly history of corporations and labor unions fighting it out in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. There's plenty of evil that was done by both sides. But this is not the situation today--not even close. Labor violence today is almost entirely by labor unions. I can easily believe that the reason that the AFL-CIO wants to "streamline" the process is that they are intimidating workers into signing authorization cards--and don't dare risk a secret ballot.

Well said.

To learn more on how union organizers mislead workers into signing away their rights and to view an appalling example of an actual "authorization card" used by Teamster union organizers to deceive employees into compulsory unionism, click here: Spotlight on "Card Check" Deception.

Sign Up for Email Alerts

Comments

Our next problem was that

Our next problem was that after three months on the job, workers were required to join the paper workers union. Those who did not received disfiguring beatings after hours. Having seen what happened to another girl in same position as Wanda and I, we decided that rather than face the same treatment we would quit our jobs before the three months ended.

Yeah, sure. Nothing like an anonymous quote to get the rightwingers riled up.

You think anyone with a brain would believe this?

Union Intimidation

Those terrible unions who want to intimidate workers so they'll get more money and more benefits ,and more safety!

How evil! They ought to be in prison.

Oh, one more thing- yes, Ms.

Oh, one more thing- yes, Ms. Crawley, it's SO sad that you can't send unionists to prison under that wicked old first amendment. What a dreadful shame- we should all just move to a country where the government shoots anyone who disagrees with them! What a lovely fantasy- a world without free speech!

This website declares that

This website declares that it intends to educate people about the truth on unions, does it not? Then I'm sure nobody here in this democratic nation of free speech would deny me the right to offer a new viewpoint. To live in a democracy is to allow the people to be in charge of the laws and to give them a chance to uphold their own rights, communicate their needs, and assure that these needs are met. The union extends democracy to a workplace by giving people a chance to be heard by those in charge, to ask for what they need to survive, and to uphold their rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. You may not always agree with what unionists say, and please believe me when I say that I respect your right to that, but if you block the unions you strip the common people of their rights, allowing those in charge to force them into anything, and to become more and more wealthy and powerful without opposition, even though they deny those who work for them in the process.

You don't have to like it, but just think logically here- if America vaules the people's rights to be active in the federation and to be treated as equal human beings, then banning it with these so-called Right to Work laws is unAmerican. Thank you for listening to me. And by the way, if we are scaring workers, then it is because we tell them how powerless they'll be without a union.

It is about freedom

Right-to-work laws do not ban unions. A right-to-work law simply makes sure that everyone has a right to join a union but also makes sure that no one can be forced to join or support a union. The freedom to join a union must not be the obligation to join.

It's for their own good!

So, what you are saying that denying rank-and-file workers the right to a secret ballot election is for their own good.

I disagree. It seems to me that workers are fully capable of making the decision without the company and the union looking over their shoulders.


Terms of Web Site Use

Copyright © 2008 National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation
 National Right to Work Legal Defense and Education Foundation, Inc.
8001 Braddock Road / Springfield, Virginia 22160
(703) 321-8510 | (800) 336-3600 / (703) 321-9613 fax - general (703) 321-9319 fax - legal department