Considering the record electioneering by Big Labor in 2008, it should be no surprise that union bosses were well-represented at this week's convention. NEA President Reg Weaver was one of the many union officials awarded for his union's political expenditures with a prime speaking slot.
Larry Sand, a teacher for 27 years and former NEA member, sent Weaver an e-mail after listening to a gross misrepresentation of reality in Weaver's DNC speech:
In the first paragraph you say, "I am here today on behalf of 3.2 million NEA members to tell you why we support Barack Obama for President of the United States." Wait a minute. It sounds as if all 3.2 million members of the NEA are supporting Obama. Then in the last sentence, you leave no doubt. "That, my friends, is why the 3.2 million members of the National Education Association are organized, energized and mobilized to help elect Barack Obama as the next president of the United States of America." This last statement is an outrage.
You have been quoted on more than one occasion that "the NEA is one-third Republican," which means that there are over one million Republican NEA members. It is audacity of the highest order to state unequivocally that these people will be "organized, energized and mobilized" to vote for a Democrat. I have been a classroom teacher for over 27 years and for many of those an NEA member, before resigning from the "Association" several years ago. I would strongly urge you to issue an apology to those Republicans still in the NEA and the American public in general for what really is a ludicrous statement.
If Weaver ever gets around to apologizing, he shouldn't only do so to the million-plus members who are Republicans since as many more are independents. Not to mention the countless Democrats who aren't in lockstep with the radical agenda of Weaver and the NEA's top brass -- many who may not even be supporters of Reg Weaver's presidential pick. And remember, these teachers are forced to finance the NEA's political activism.
As it happens, Mark Mix, President of the National Right to Work Foundation, has an op-ed on the problems of teacher union monopoly power in today's Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. Also check out this column in the Providence Journal from Gary Beckner, executive director of the Association of American Educators, a nonprofit professional teachers association that is entirely voluntary.









Comments
I also want to thank you for
I also want to thank you for standing up against the NEA. I do not support the presidential candidate chosen by NEA. I received a magazine yesterday that was full of reasons why the members will vote for that candidate and I must say that it has been difficult to get my mind off of what I read.
union dues
We were informed today that our annual dues are going up to $712.00 dollars annually. This announcement was made right after I grabbed my mail from my PO box and you can guess what was on the top of the pile; a glossy (and expensive ad) for Obama. How do I get out of the union all together?
Thanks for your help.
Thanks you
Thank you for standing up to the NEA. My experience in education has lead me to believe that the NEA is one main reason for the decline in our student performance. The atmosphere in our schools is divisive, and the union doesn't care. Teachers should not be forced to pay dues that hurt their family. Good teachers don't need unions because good teachers work for the kids.