{"id":873,"date":"2012-05-03T11:08:34","date_gmt":"2012-05-03T11:08:34","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2016-08-09T16:31:47","modified_gmt":"2016-08-09T16:31:47","slug":"u-s-appeals-court-rejects-obama-administration-stance-in-case-challenging-backroom-union-deals","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/news\/u-s-appeals-court-rejects-obama-administration-stance-in-case-challenging-backroom-union-deals\/","title":{"rendered":"U.S. Appeals Court Rejects Obama Administration Stance in Case Challenging Backroom Union Deals"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"News<\/p>\n

U.S. Appeals Court Rejects Obama Administration Stance in Case Challenging Backroom Union Deals<\/a><\/h2>\n

Obama Labor Board and Departments of Labor, Justice sought to roll back worker’s federal court victory<\/h3>\n

Hollywood, FL (May 3, 2012)<\/b> \u2013 The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has shot down the Obama Administration’s attempt to roll back a worker’s protracted, precedent-setting legal victory against a local union.<\/p>\n

The case is a legal challenge initiated by Hollywood, Florida-area Mardi Gras Gaming groundskeeper Martin Mulhall with free legal assistance from the National Right to Work Foundation.<\/p>\n

In 2008, Mardi Gras entered into an agreement with Unite Here Local 355 union officials promising that it would hand over employees’ personal contact information (including home addresses), grant union operatives access to company facilities for the purpose of organizing through a coercive card check campaign, and refrain from speaking about the downsides of unionization. In return, the Unite Here officials expended over one hundred thousand dollars to support a gambling ballot initiative and guaranteed not to picket, boycott, or strike the facility.<\/p>\n

Read the entire release here.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\"News<\/p>\n

U.S. Appeals Court Rejects Obama Administration Stance in Case Challenging Backroom Union Deals<\/a><\/h2>\n

Obama Labor Board and Departments of Labor, Justice sought to roll back worker’s federal court victory<\/h3>\n

Hollywood, FL (May 3, 2012)<\/b> \u2013 The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has shot down the Obama Administration’s attempt to roll back a worker’s protracted, precedent-setting legal victory against a local union.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[888],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-873","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"yoast_head":"\nU.S. Appeals Court Rejects Obama Administration Stance in Case Challenging Backroom Union Deals - National Right to Work Foundation<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/news\/u-s-appeals-court-rejects-obama-administration-stance-in-case-challenging-backroom-union-deals\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"es_ES\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"U.S. Appeals Court Rejects Obama Administration Stance in Case Challenging Backroom Union Deals - National Right to Work Foundation\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"U.S. Appeals Court Rejects Obama Administration Stance in Case Challenging Backroom Union Deals Obama Labor Board and Departments of Labor, Justice sought to roll back worker's federal court victory Hollywood, FL (May 3, 2012) \u2013 The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has shot down the Obama Administration's attempt to roll back a worker's protracted, precedent-setting legal victory against a local union.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/news\/u-s-appeals-court-rejects-obama-administration-stance-in-case-challenging-backroom-union-deals\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"National Right to Work Foundation\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2012-05-03T11:08:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-08-09T16:31:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal Information\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Escrito por\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal Information\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Tiempo de lectura\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minuto\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/news\\\/u-s-appeals-court-rejects-obama-administration-stance-in-case-challenging-backroom-union-deals\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/news\\\/u-s-appeals-court-rejects-obama-administration-stance-in-case-challenging-backroom-union-deals\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal Information\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/81f7d2108bad2dd3d10068a71f2e3f8f\"},\"headline\":\"U.S. Appeals Court Rejects Obama Administration Stance in Case Challenging Backroom Union Deals\",\"datePublished\":\"2012-05-03T11:08:34+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-09T16:31:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/news\\\/u-s-appeals-court-rejects-obama-administration-stance-in-case-challenging-backroom-union-deals\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":190,\"commentCount\":0,\"articleSection\":[\"News Releases\"],\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/news\\\/u-s-appeals-court-rejects-obama-administration-stance-in-case-challenging-backroom-union-deals\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/news\\\/u-s-appeals-court-rejects-obama-administration-stance-in-case-challenging-backroom-union-deals\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/news\\\/u-s-appeals-court-rejects-obama-administration-stance-in-case-challenging-backroom-union-deals\\\/\",\"name\":\"U.S. Appeals Court Rejects Obama Administration Stance in Case Challenging Backroom Union Deals - National Right to Work Foundation\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2012-05-03T11:08:34+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-09T16:31:47+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/81f7d2108bad2dd3d10068a71f2e3f8f\"},\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/news\\\/u-s-appeals-court-rejects-obama-administration-stance-in-case-challenging-backroom-union-deals\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/\",\"name\":\"National Right to Work Foundation\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"es\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/81f7d2108bad2dd3d10068a71f2e3f8f\",\"name\":\"Legal Information\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9dd8b017e6d8f6d3a8f6565a48c44ec34db5e7a0837308bad9505aaa64ba93fc?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9dd8b017e6d8f6d3a8f6565a48c44ec34db5e7a0837308bad9505aaa64ba93fc?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9dd8b017e6d8f6d3a8f6565a48c44ec34db5e7a0837308bad9505aaa64ba93fc?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal Information\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/es\\\/author\\\/nrtw\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"U.S. Appeals Court Rejects Obama Administration Stance in Case Challenging Backroom Union Deals - National Right to Work Foundation","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/news\/u-s-appeals-court-rejects-obama-administration-stance-in-case-challenging-backroom-union-deals\/","og_locale":"es_ES","og_type":"article","og_title":"U.S. Appeals Court Rejects Obama Administration Stance in Case Challenging Backroom Union Deals - National Right to Work Foundation","og_description":"U.S. Appeals Court Rejects Obama Administration Stance in Case Challenging Backroom Union Deals Obama Labor Board and Departments of Labor, Justice sought to roll back worker's federal court victory Hollywood, FL (May 3, 2012) \u2013 The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has shot down the Obama Administration's attempt to roll back a worker's protracted, precedent-setting legal victory against a local union.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/news\/u-s-appeals-court-rejects-obama-administration-stance-in-case-challenging-backroom-union-deals\/","og_site_name":"National Right to Work Foundation","article_published_time":"2012-05-03T11:08:34+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-08-09T16:31:47+00:00","author":"Legal Information","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Escrito por":"Legal Information","Tiempo de lectura":"1 minuto"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/news\/u-s-appeals-court-rejects-obama-administration-stance-in-case-challenging-backroom-union-deals\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/news\/u-s-appeals-court-rejects-obama-administration-stance-in-case-challenging-backroom-union-deals\/"},"author":{"name":"Legal Information","@id":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/#\/schema\/person\/81f7d2108bad2dd3d10068a71f2e3f8f"},"headline":"U.S. Appeals Court Rejects Obama Administration Stance in Case Challenging Backroom Union Deals","datePublished":"2012-05-03T11:08:34+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-09T16:31:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/news\/u-s-appeals-court-rejects-obama-administration-stance-in-case-challenging-backroom-union-deals\/"},"wordCount":190,"commentCount":0,"articleSection":["News Releases"],"inLanguage":"es","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/news\/u-s-appeals-court-rejects-obama-administration-stance-in-case-challenging-backroom-union-deals\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/news\/u-s-appeals-court-rejects-obama-administration-stance-in-case-challenging-backroom-union-deals\/","url":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/news\/u-s-appeals-court-rejects-obama-administration-stance-in-case-challenging-backroom-union-deals\/","name":"U.S. Appeals Court Rejects Obama Administration Stance in Case Challenging Backroom Union Deals - National Right to Work Foundation","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2012-05-03T11:08:34+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-09T16:31:47+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/#\/schema\/person\/81f7d2108bad2dd3d10068a71f2e3f8f"},"inLanguage":"es","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/news\/u-s-appeals-court-rejects-obama-administration-stance-in-case-challenging-backroom-union-deals\/"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/","name":"National Right to Work Foundation","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"es"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/#\/schema\/person\/81f7d2108bad2dd3d10068a71f2e3f8f","name":"Legal Information","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9dd8b017e6d8f6d3a8f6565a48c44ec34db5e7a0837308bad9505aaa64ba93fc?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9dd8b017e6d8f6d3a8f6565a48c44ec34db5e7a0837308bad9505aaa64ba93fc?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9dd8b017e6d8f6d3a8f6565a48c44ec34db5e7a0837308bad9505aaa64ba93fc?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal Information"},"url":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/author\/nrtw\/"}]}},"modified_by":"Nick Cote","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/873","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=873"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/873\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4582,"href":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/873\/revisions\/4582"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=873"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=873"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=873"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}