\nWashington, DC (December 17, 2009)<\/b> \u2013 In five new cases before the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), union lawyers are asking the NLRB to overturn a landmark 2007 decision which gave new protections to workers swept into union ranks through card check forced unionism.\n<\/p>\n
\nIn Dana Corporation<\/i>, National Right to Work Foundation attorneys won new rights for employees intended to counteract the employee intimidation and harassment waged by aggressive union operatives that frequently occurs during controversial card check organizing campaigns.\n<\/p>\n
\nThe Dana<\/i> decision granted employees the ability to file a decertification petition and demand a secret ballot election to toss out union officials from their workplace within 45 days after an employer recognizes a monopoly bargaining agent by card check. This important (though modest) check gives workers some ability to stop union organizers from gaining monopoly control over a workplace without even the support of a majority of the employees.\n<\/p>\n
\nThe very Foundation attorneys who originally won the landmark Dana<\/i> case are providing free legal assistance to Todd Fields, an ARAMARK Uniform and Career Apparel employee in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and Mike Lopez, an employee of Lamons Gasket Company in Houston, Texas, in two of the five cases before the NLRB. These two cases seeking to overturn Dana were pressed by Service Workers United (SEIU) and United Steelworkers union lawyers.\n<\/p>\n
\nIn each of these cases, more than 30 percent of the employees at each employer asked for a secret ballot election to decertify the newly installed union, and union lawyers asked for the election petitions to be dismissed. Union lawyers argue that giving the employees a secret ballot election is a \u201cradical departure\u201d from established law.\n<\/p>\n
\n\u201cThe fact that many employees corralled into a union through the card check scheme have almost immediately thrown the union back out through a private ballot vote demonstrates card check\u2019s unreliable and coercive nature,\u201d said Stefan Gleason, vice president of the National Right to Work Foundation. \u201cBecause the Dana<\/i> election process inherently undermines Big Labor\u2019s case to permanently end secret ballot elections, union lawyers are determined to undo this modest check on union intimidation.\u201d\n<\/p>\n
\nIn the Dana<\/i> ruling, the NLRB majority pointed out, \u201ccard checks are less reliable because they lack secrecy and procedural safeguards\u2026 union card-solicitation campaigns have been accompanied by misinformation\u2026 workers sometimes sign union authorization cards\u2026to get the person off their back.\u201d\n<\/p>\n
\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\nWashington, DC (December 17, 2009)<\/b> \u2013 In five new cases before the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), union lawyers are asking the NLRB to overturn a landmark 2007 decision which gave new protections to workers swept into union ranks through card check forced unionism.\n<\/p>\n
\nIn Dana Corporation<\/i>, National Right to Work Foundation attorneys won new rights for employees intended to counteract the employee intimidation and harassment waged by aggressive union operatives that frequently occurs during controversial card check organizing campaigns.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[888],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2849","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"yoast_head":"\n