{"id":11139,"date":"2019-06-04T16:50:44","date_gmt":"2019-06-04T21:50:44","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=11139"},"modified":"2019-06-04T16:52:20","modified_gmt":"2019-06-04T21:52:20","slug":"riffey-cert-reply-4062019","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/news\/riffey-cert-reply-4062019\/","title":{"rendered":"Illinois Care Providers File Final Brief Asking Supreme Court to Take Case Seeking Return of Illegally-Seized Forced Union Fees"},"content":{"rendered":"

Today National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation staff attorneys filed the final brief<\/a> in Riffey v. Pritzker<\/i> before the US Supreme Court conferences to decide whether or not to hear the case. The case is a continuation of the 2014 Foundation-won Supreme Court Harris v. Quinn<\/i> case, and now seeks the refunds of seized union dues for over 80,000 home caregivers in Illinois.<\/p>\n

National Right to Work Foundation President Mark Mix offered the following comments on the filing of the Petitioner\u2019s Reply Brief today:<\/p>\n

\u201cIllinois homecare providers should no longer be forced to jump through legal hoops to reclaim their money that should never have been taken from them in the first place. The Supreme Court already decided in Harris v. Quinn that forcing homecare providers to pay fees to an unwanted union is unconstitutional in principle, and subsequently in Janus the court clarified that any dues taken without consent is a First Amendment violation. Riffey\u2019s petition simply asks the High Court to apply the principles it laid out in Harris and Janus to the tens of thousands of Illinois providers so they can reclaim the over $32 million dollars seized from them.\u00bb<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Background<\/strong><\/p>\n

In February<\/a>, with free legal aid from the National Right to Work Foundation, a group of Illinois homecare providers filed a petition asking the U.S. Supreme Court to review their case in which providers seek the return of more than $32 million in union fees seized by SEIU officials in a scheme the High Court already declared unconstitutional. <\/p>\n

The case, Riffey v. Pritzker<\/i>, is a continuation of the 2014 Foundation-won Supreme Court Harris v. Quinn<\/i> case. In Harris<\/i>, the Court ruled that a scheme imposed by the State of Illinois, in which more than 80,000 individual homecare providers were forced to pay union fees out of the state funding they receive, violated the providers\u2019 First Amendment rights.<\/p>\n

In 2014, the case was re-designated Riffey v. Rauner<\/i> (now Riffey v. Pritzker<\/i>) and remanded to the District Court to settle remaining issues, including whether or not tens of thousands of providers who had not joined the union would receive refunds of the money taken from them unlawfully by the SEIU. <\/p>\n

In June 2016, the District Court denied a motion for class certification. The ruling allowed the SEIU to keep more than $32 million in unconstitutional fees confiscated from union nonmembers who had not consented to their money being taken for union fees. Foundation staff attorneys appealed that ruling to the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, which also denied class certification.<\/p>\n

In 2018, Foundation staff attorneys successfully petitioned the Supreme Court to review and reverse the Appeals Court\u2019s ruling. The High Court did so the day after it issued the landmark Janus v. AFSCME<\/i> decision, ordering the Appeals Court to reconsider the case in light of the Janus<\/i> ruling, which struck down public sector forced union fees as violating the First Amendment.<\/p>\n

In Janus<\/i>, which was argued by the same National Right to Work Foundation staff attorney who is lead counsel in Riffey<\/i>, the Supreme Court clarified that any union fees taken without an individual\u2019s prior informed consent violate the First Amendment. That standard supports the Riffey<\/i> plaintiffs\u2019 claim that all providers who had money seized without their consent are entitled to refunds.<\/p>\n

However, on December 6 a three-judge panel of the Appeals Court affirmed its previous ruling that no class can be certified for the more than 80,000 providers whose money was seized in violation of their First Amendment rights. The majority opinion, signed by two of the judges, denied class on the grounds that each individual homecare provider would have to prove that he or she objected to the taking of the fees when the seizures occurred.<\/p>\n

In their petition for certiorari asking the Supreme Court to hear their case, the providers argue that Janus<\/i> requires that the lower court\u2019s class certification order be reversed. Foundation staff attorneys point out that the Janus<\/i> precedent does not require a worker to prove his or her subjective opposition to forced union fees but held that the First Amendment is violated anytime union dues or fees are seized without clear affirmative consent. <\/p>\n

Foundation attorneys argue that the case is of exceptional importance not only because it concerns the return of more than $32 million seized from some 80,000 homecare providers in violation of their First Amendment rights, but also because the lower courts\u2019 ruling sets a precedent that could result in the denial of relief for millions of public employee victims of forced unionism.<\/p>\n

All the briefs in the case can be viewed on the US Supreme Court’s docket here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Disculpa, pero esta entrada est\u00e1 disponible s\u00f3lo en English<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":21,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[888],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11139","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"yoast_head":"\nIllinois Care Providers File Final Brief Asking Supreme Court to Take Case Seeking Return of Illegally-Seized Forced Union Fees - National Right to Work Foundation<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/news\/riffey-cert-reply-4062019\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"es_ES\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Illinois Care Providers File Final Brief Asking Supreme Court to Take Case Seeking Return of Illegally-Seized Forced Union Fees - National Right to Work Foundation\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Care providers ask High Court to overturn ruling denying refunds of $32 million in forced union fees seized from 80,000 providers in violation of First Amendment WASHINGTON, DC - Today National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation staff attorneys filed the final brief in Riffey v. Pritzker before the US Supreme Court conferences to decide whether or not to hear the case. The case is a continuation of the 2014 Foundation-won Supreme Court Harris v. Quinn case, and now seeks the refunds of seized union dues for over 80,000 home caregivers in Illinois.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/news\/riffey-cert-reply-4062019\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"National Right to Work Foundation\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-06-04T21:50:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-06-04T21:52:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jacob Comello\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Escrito por\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jacob Comello\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Tiempo de lectura\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutos\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/news\\\/riffey-cert-reply-4062019\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/news\\\/riffey-cert-reply-4062019\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Jacob Comello\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b73b0921cd10844f341794300a0a6d2b\"},\"headline\":\"Illinois Care Providers File Final Brief Asking Supreme Court to Take Case Seeking Return of Illegally-Seized Forced Union Fees\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-06-04T21:50:44+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-06-04T21:52:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/news\\\/riffey-cert-reply-4062019\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":784,\"articleSection\":[\"News Releases\"],\"inLanguage\":\"es\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/news\\\/riffey-cert-reply-4062019\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/news\\\/riffey-cert-reply-4062019\\\/\",\"name\":\"Illinois Care Providers File Final Brief Asking Supreme Court to Take Case Seeking Return of Illegally-Seized Forced Union Fees - National Right to Work Foundation\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-06-04T21:50:44+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-06-04T21:52:20+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b73b0921cd10844f341794300a0a6d2b\"},\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/news\\\/riffey-cert-reply-4062019\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/\",\"name\":\"National Right to Work Foundation\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"es\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b73b0921cd10844f341794300a0a6d2b\",\"name\":\"Jacob Comello\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/0c2962f98ada11c5cf6b7d377709519d40eba673737dbac3a3aa69ef269fc9d8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/0c2962f98ada11c5cf6b7d377709519d40eba673737dbac3a3aa69ef269fc9d8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/0c2962f98ada11c5cf6b7d377709519d40eba673737dbac3a3aa69ef269fc9d8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Jacob Comello\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/es\\\/author\\\/jacob-comello\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Illinois Care Providers File Final Brief Asking Supreme Court to Take Case Seeking Return of Illegally-Seized Forced Union Fees - National Right to Work Foundation","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/news\/riffey-cert-reply-4062019\/","og_locale":"es_ES","og_type":"article","og_title":"Illinois Care Providers File Final Brief Asking Supreme Court to Take Case Seeking Return of Illegally-Seized Forced Union Fees - National Right to Work Foundation","og_description":"Care providers ask High Court to overturn ruling denying refunds of $32 million in forced union fees seized from 80,000 providers in violation of First Amendment WASHINGTON, DC - Today National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation staff attorneys filed the final brief in Riffey v. Pritzker before the US Supreme Court conferences to decide whether or not to hear the case. The case is a continuation of the 2014 Foundation-won Supreme Court Harris v. Quinn case, and now seeks the refunds of seized union dues for over 80,000 home caregivers in Illinois.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/news\/riffey-cert-reply-4062019\/","og_site_name":"National Right to Work Foundation","article_published_time":"2019-06-04T21:50:44+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-06-04T21:52:20+00:00","author":"Jacob Comello","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Escrito por":"Jacob Comello","Tiempo de lectura":"4 minutos"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/news\/riffey-cert-reply-4062019\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/news\/riffey-cert-reply-4062019\/"},"author":{"name":"Jacob Comello","@id":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/#\/schema\/person\/b73b0921cd10844f341794300a0a6d2b"},"headline":"Illinois Care Providers File Final Brief Asking Supreme Court to Take Case Seeking Return of Illegally-Seized Forced Union Fees","datePublished":"2019-06-04T21:50:44+00:00","dateModified":"2019-06-04T21:52:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/news\/riffey-cert-reply-4062019\/"},"wordCount":784,"articleSection":["News Releases"],"inLanguage":"es"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/news\/riffey-cert-reply-4062019\/","url":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/news\/riffey-cert-reply-4062019\/","name":"Illinois Care Providers File Final Brief Asking Supreme Court to Take Case Seeking Return of Illegally-Seized Forced Union Fees - National Right to Work Foundation","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-06-04T21:50:44+00:00","dateModified":"2019-06-04T21:52:20+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/#\/schema\/person\/b73b0921cd10844f341794300a0a6d2b"},"inLanguage":"es","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/news\/riffey-cert-reply-4062019\/"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/","name":"National Right to Work Foundation","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"es"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/#\/schema\/person\/b73b0921cd10844f341794300a0a6d2b","name":"Jacob Comello","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0c2962f98ada11c5cf6b7d377709519d40eba673737dbac3a3aa69ef269fc9d8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0c2962f98ada11c5cf6b7d377709519d40eba673737dbac3a3aa69ef269fc9d8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0c2962f98ada11c5cf6b7d377709519d40eba673737dbac3a3aa69ef269fc9d8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Jacob Comello"},"url":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/author\/jacob-comello\/"}]}},"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11139","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/21"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11139"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11139\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11152,"href":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11139\/revisions\/11152"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11139"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11139"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11139"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}