![\"News](\"\/i\/newsrelease.png\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Washington, DC (September 23, 2013)<\/b> \u2013 National Right to Work Foundation staff attorneys filed a brief at the United States Supreme Court late Friday for a Florida casino worker challenging a much used union organizing scheme. The case, Mulhall v. UNITE HERE<\/i>, could determine whether union organizers can receive workers’ personal information and other valuable organizing tools in exchange for concessions at employees’ expense.<\/p>\n
In 2004, UNITE HERE Local 355 and Mardi Gras Gaming entered into an agreement in which union officials promised to devote over one hundred thousand dollars to help pass a gambling ballot initiative and guaranteed not to picket, boycott, or strike against Mardi Gras facilities.<\/p>\n
In return, Mardi Gras agreed to give union operatives workers’ personal contact information (including home addresses), grant them access to company facilities during a coercive ‘card check’ organizing campaign, refrain from informing workers about the impact of unionization, and refrain from requesting a federally-supervised secret ballot election to determine whether employees unionized.<\/p>\n
Click here to read the full release.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<\/p>\nWorker Files Brief in Supreme Court Case Challenging Backroom Union Organizing Deal<\/a><\/h2>\n
Right to Work legal challenge could determine if companies are allowed to hand over sensitive employee information to aggressive union organizers<\/h3>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[888],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1032","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"yoast_head":"\n