{"id":1003,"date":"2013-06-10T12:35:21","date_gmt":"2013-06-10T12:35:21","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2016-08-09T16:22:57","modified_gmt":"2016-08-09T16:22:57","slug":"harris-v-quinn-supreme-court-update","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/blog\/harris-v-quinn-supreme-court-update\/","title":{"rendered":"Harris v. Quinn Supreme Court Update"},"content":{"rendered":"

\nRegular Freedom@Work <\/i>readers may remember\u00a0the case of Pam Harris<\/a>, an Illinois woman who is challenging an SEIU scheme aimed at forcing her and other homecare providers into union ranks. For the past several years, Harris has received free legal assistance from Foundation staff attorneys.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n

\nIn November 2011, Harris filed a a petition for a writ of certiorari<\/i>\u00a0at the Supreme Court, challenging the SEIU’s forced-unionism scheme on the grounds that it violates homecare providers’ freedom of association and freedom of speech. Last June, the Supreme Court asked for a brief on the issues presented from the Solicitor General, a move that could indicate heightened interest in the case. The Solicitor General’s brief was filed in early May. Harris’s Foundation-provided staff attorney submitted a reply shortly thereafter.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n

\nAlthough we hoped the Supreme Court would announce whether it would take the case this morning, it was not on today’s orders list, meaning the case will be conferenced again this Thursday. That makes this coming Monday (June 17th) the likely day the Court will announce whether or not it will take the case.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n

\nFor more information on the case, including links to Harris’s petition and several amicus curiae<\/i>\u00a0briefs filed in support of her arguments, check out\u00a0Scotusblog<\/a>.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\nRegular Freedom@Work <\/i>readers may remember\u00a0the case of Pam Harris<\/a>, an Illinois woman who is challenging an SEIU scheme aimed at forcing her and other homecare providers into union ranks. For the past several years, Harris has received free legal assistance from Foundation staff attorneys.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n

\nIn November 2011, Harris filed a a petition for a writ of certiorari<\/i>\u00a0at the Supreme Court, challenging the SEIU’s forced-unionism scheme on the grounds that it violates homecare providers’ freedom of association and freedom of speech. Last June, the Supreme Court asked for a brief on the issues presented from the Solicitor General, a move that could indicate heightened interest in the case. The Solicitor General’s brief was filed in early May. Harris’s Foundation-provided staff attorney submitted a reply shortly thereafter.\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[889],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1003","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-blog"],"yoast_head":"\nHarris v. Quinn Supreme Court Update - National Right to Work Foundation<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/blog\/harris-v-quinn-supreme-court-update\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"es_ES\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Harris v. Quinn Supreme Court Update - National Right to Work Foundation\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Regular Freedom@Work readers may remember\u00a0the case of Pam Harris, an Illinois woman who is challenging an SEIU scheme aimed at forcing her and other homecare providers into union ranks. For the past several years, Harris has received free legal assistance from Foundation staff attorneys.\u00a0 In November 2011, Harris filed a a petition for a writ of certiorari\u00a0at the Supreme Court, challenging the SEIU's forced-unionism scheme on the grounds that it violates homecare providers' freedom of association and freedom of speech. Last June, the Supreme Court asked for a brief on the issues presented from the Solicitor General, a move that could indicate heightened interest in the case. The Solicitor General's brief was filed in early May. Harris's Foundation-provided staff attorney submitted a reply shortly thereafter.\u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/blog\/harris-v-quinn-supreme-court-update\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"National Right to Work Foundation\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2013-06-10T12:35:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-08-09T16:22:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal Information\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Escrito por\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal Information\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Tiempo de lectura\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minuto\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/es\\\/blog\\\/harris-v-quinn-supreme-court-update\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/es\\\/blog\\\/harris-v-quinn-supreme-court-update\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal Information\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/81f7d2108bad2dd3d10068a71f2e3f8f\"},\"headline\":\"Harris v. Quinn Supreme Court Update\",\"datePublished\":\"2013-06-10T12:35:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-09T16:22:57+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/es\\\/blog\\\/harris-v-quinn-supreme-court-update\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":212,\"commentCount\":0,\"articleSection\":[\"Blog\"],\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/es\\\/blog\\\/harris-v-quinn-supreme-court-update\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/es\\\/blog\\\/harris-v-quinn-supreme-court-update\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/es\\\/blog\\\/harris-v-quinn-supreme-court-update\\\/\",\"name\":\"Harris v. Quinn Supreme Court Update - National Right to Work Foundation\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2013-06-10T12:35:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-09T16:22:57+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/81f7d2108bad2dd3d10068a71f2e3f8f\"},\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/es\\\/blog\\\/harris-v-quinn-supreme-court-update\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/\",\"name\":\"National Right to Work Foundation\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"es\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/81f7d2108bad2dd3d10068a71f2e3f8f\",\"name\":\"Legal Information\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9dd8b017e6d8f6d3a8f6565a48c44ec34db5e7a0837308bad9505aaa64ba93fc?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9dd8b017e6d8f6d3a8f6565a48c44ec34db5e7a0837308bad9505aaa64ba93fc?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9dd8b017e6d8f6d3a8f6565a48c44ec34db5e7a0837308bad9505aaa64ba93fc?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal Information\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/es\\\/author\\\/nrtw\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Harris v. Quinn Supreme Court Update - National Right to Work Foundation","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/blog\/harris-v-quinn-supreme-court-update\/","og_locale":"es_ES","og_type":"article","og_title":"Harris v. Quinn Supreme Court Update - National Right to Work Foundation","og_description":"Regular Freedom@Work readers may remember\u00a0the case of Pam Harris, an Illinois woman who is challenging an SEIU scheme aimed at forcing her and other homecare providers into union ranks. For the past several years, Harris has received free legal assistance from Foundation staff attorneys.\u00a0 In November 2011, Harris filed a a petition for a writ of certiorari\u00a0at the Supreme Court, challenging the SEIU's forced-unionism scheme on the grounds that it violates homecare providers' freedom of association and freedom of speech. Last June, the Supreme Court asked for a brief on the issues presented from the Solicitor General, a move that could indicate heightened interest in the case. The Solicitor General's brief was filed in early May. Harris's Foundation-provided staff attorney submitted a reply shortly thereafter.\u00a0","og_url":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/blog\/harris-v-quinn-supreme-court-update\/","og_site_name":"National Right to Work Foundation","article_published_time":"2013-06-10T12:35:21+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-08-09T16:22:57+00:00","author":"Legal Information","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Escrito por":"Legal Information","Tiempo de lectura":"1 minuto"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/blog\/harris-v-quinn-supreme-court-update\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/blog\/harris-v-quinn-supreme-court-update\/"},"author":{"name":"Legal Information","@id":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/#\/schema\/person\/81f7d2108bad2dd3d10068a71f2e3f8f"},"headline":"Harris v. Quinn Supreme Court Update","datePublished":"2013-06-10T12:35:21+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-09T16:22:57+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/blog\/harris-v-quinn-supreme-court-update\/"},"wordCount":212,"commentCount":0,"articleSection":["Blog"],"inLanguage":"es","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/blog\/harris-v-quinn-supreme-court-update\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/blog\/harris-v-quinn-supreme-court-update\/","url":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/blog\/harris-v-quinn-supreme-court-update\/","name":"Harris v. Quinn Supreme Court Update - National Right to Work Foundation","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2013-06-10T12:35:21+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-09T16:22:57+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/#\/schema\/person\/81f7d2108bad2dd3d10068a71f2e3f8f"},"inLanguage":"es","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/blog\/harris-v-quinn-supreme-court-update\/"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/","name":"National Right to Work Foundation","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"es"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/#\/schema\/person\/81f7d2108bad2dd3d10068a71f2e3f8f","name":"Legal Information","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9dd8b017e6d8f6d3a8f6565a48c44ec34db5e7a0837308bad9505aaa64ba93fc?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9dd8b017e6d8f6d3a8f6565a48c44ec34db5e7a0837308bad9505aaa64ba93fc?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9dd8b017e6d8f6d3a8f6565a48c44ec34db5e7a0837308bad9505aaa64ba93fc?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal Information"},"url":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/author\/nrtw\/"}]}},"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1003","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1003"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1003\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5308,"href":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1003\/revisions\/5308"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1003"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1003"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1003"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}