{"id":2172,"date":"2013-07-16T10:08:02","date_gmt":"2013-07-16T14:08:02","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"-0001-11-30T04:00:00","slug":"nlrb-watch-response-to-harry-reid-and-his-nuclear-option","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/nlrb-watch-response-to-harry-reid-and-his-nuclear-option\/","title":{"rendered":"NLRB Watch: Response to Harry Reid and his nuclear option"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In a July 13, 2013, <i>The Hill<\/i> article, \u00abReid: Low approval of Congress justifies triggering nuclear option in Senate,\u00bb Alexander Bolton reports on Senator Reid&#8217;s interview by David Gregory on NBC&#8217;s <i>Meet the Press<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>Senator Reid suggests a \u00abvery, very minimal\u00bb change to the Senate&#8217;s filibuster rule to enable the President to have the \u00abteam\u00bb he wants. Apparently Senator Reid either doesn&#8217;t know or wishes to ignore that the National Labor Relations Board is an independent agency of the Executive Branch.  NLRB Members perform quasi-adjudicatory functions and are <i>not<\/i> on a President&#8217;s \u00abteam\u00bb or \u00abcabinet.\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>Should Senator Reid proceed, it will affirm that our nation&#8217;s labor law, the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, <i>must be overhauled<\/i> to create an Article III federal district court to decide labor law cases. Senator Reid&#8217;s efforts to amend the Senate&#8217;s filibuster rule will assure that no future NLRB decision will be the product of independent, neutral, apolitical, quasi-judicial review. Rather, Senator Reid&#8217;s effort will insure that the NLRB will be an executive branch political bureau.<\/p>\n<p>Do not \u00abemployees,\u00bb our fellow citizens, you and I, deserve some semblance of fairness in the resolution of cases arising under our nation&#8217;s labor law?<\/p>\n<p>Moreover, Senator Reid&#8217;s insistence on voting on the current five nominees to our nation&#8217;s labor law court as a <i>package<\/i> rather than individually is further evidence of his deliberate attempt to ensure that the NLRB is a political bureau controlled by the White House. If NLRB Members are to perform their duties under our nation&#8217;s National Labor Relations Act, they are like and akin to federal court judges and, therefore, should be voted on individually.  To vote on independent agency quasi-judicial nominees as a <i>package<\/i> is to ignore, and sadly, further erode any notion of the RULE OF LAW.<\/p>\n<p>Last NLRB Watch: <a href=\"\/en\/nlrb-watch\/nlrbs-bias-scorecard\">The NLRB&#8217;s &#8216;Bias Scorecard&#8217;<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Next NLRB Watch: <a href=\"\/en\/nlrb-watch\/it-depends-upon-what-meaning-non-existent-if\">It depends upon what the meaning of the non-existent \u00abif\u00bb is&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In a July 13, 2013, <i>The Hill<\/i> article, \u00abReid: Low approval of Congress justifies triggering nuclear option in Senate,\u00bb Alexander Bolton reports on Senator Reid&#8217;s interview by David Gregory on NBC&#8217;s <i>Meet the Press<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>Senator Reid suggests a \u00abvery, very minimal\u00bb change to the Senate&#8217;s filibuster rule to enable the President to have the \u00abteam\u00bb he wants. Apparently Senator Reid either doesn&#8217;t know or wishes to ignore that the National Labor Relations Board is an independent agency of the Executive Branch.  NLRB Members perform quasi-adjudicatory functions and are <i>not<\/i> on a President&#8217;s \u00abteam\u00bb or \u00abcabinet.\u00bb<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":435,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-2172","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>NLRB Watch: Response to Harry Reid and his nuclear option - National Right to Work Foundation<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/nlrb-watch-response-to-harry-reid-and-his-nuclear-option\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"es_ES\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"NLRB Watch: Response to Harry Reid and his nuclear option - National Right to Work Foundation\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In a July 13, 2013, The Hill article, &quot;Reid: Low approval of Congress justifies triggering nuclear option in Senate,&quot; Alexander Bolton reports on Senator Reid&#039;s interview by David Gregory on NBC&#039;s Meet the Press.Senator Reid suggests a &quot;very, very minimal&quot; change to the Senate&#039;s filibuster rule to enable the President to have the &quot;team&quot; he wants. Apparently Senator Reid either doesn&#039;t know or wishes to ignore that the National Labor Relations Board is an independent agency of the Executive Branch. NLRB Members perform quasi-adjudicatory functions and are not on a President&#039;s &quot;team&quot; or &quot;cabinet.&quot;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/nlrb-watch-response-to-harry-reid-and-his-nuclear-option\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"National Right to Work Foundation\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Tiempo de lectura\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"2 minutos\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/nlrb-watch-response-to-harry-reid-and-his-nuclear-option\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/nlrb-watch-response-to-harry-reid-and-his-nuclear-option\\\/\",\"name\":\"NLRB Watch: Response to Harry Reid and his nuclear option - National Right to Work Foundation\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"-0001-11-30T00:00:00+00:00\",\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/nlrb-watch-response-to-harry-reid-and-his-nuclear-option\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/\",\"name\":\"National Right to Work Foundation\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.nrtw.org\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"es\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"NLRB Watch: Response to Harry Reid and his nuclear option - National Right to Work Foundation","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/nlrb-watch-response-to-harry-reid-and-his-nuclear-option\/","og_locale":"es_ES","og_type":"article","og_title":"NLRB Watch: Response to Harry Reid and his nuclear option - National Right to Work Foundation","og_description":"In a July 13, 2013, The Hill article, \"Reid: Low approval of Congress justifies triggering nuclear option in Senate,\" Alexander Bolton reports on Senator Reid's interview by David Gregory on NBC's Meet the Press.Senator Reid suggests a \"very, very minimal\" change to the Senate's filibuster rule to enable the President to have the \"team\" he wants. Apparently Senator Reid either doesn't know or wishes to ignore that the National Labor Relations Board is an independent agency of the Executive Branch. NLRB Members perform quasi-adjudicatory functions and are not on a President's \"team\" or \"cabinet.\"","og_url":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/nlrb-watch-response-to-harry-reid-and-his-nuclear-option\/","og_site_name":"National Right to Work Foundation","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Tiempo de lectura":"2 minutos"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/nlrb-watch-response-to-harry-reid-and-his-nuclear-option\/","url":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/nlrb-watch-response-to-harry-reid-and-his-nuclear-option\/","name":"NLRB Watch: Response to Harry Reid and his nuclear option - National Right to Work Foundation","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00+00:00","inLanguage":"es","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/nlrb-watch-response-to-harry-reid-and-his-nuclear-option\/"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/","name":"National Right to Work Foundation","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"es"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2172","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/435"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2172"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2172\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2172"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}