<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.nrtw.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Public Sector Workers</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/public-sector-workers</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>No More Trees, AFSCME Union Tells Detroit</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/no-more-trees-union-tells-city072320081</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees union &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080717/NEWS01/807170373/1003/NEWS01&quot;&gt;is objecting&lt;/a&gt; to a plan by Detroit city officials to turn over an abandoned nursery to Greening of Detroit, a nonprofit group. What&#039;s the problem, exactly? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
	Using privately raised funds and volunteers, the group would restore the nursery and use it to provide mature trees to neighborhoods. Greening already plants 2,000 trees a year throughout the city. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	But the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees obtained an injunction from Wayne County Circuit Court against the deal, saying it violates the collective bargaining agreement. The union says the bargaining agreement applies to any deals to turn over control of city operations to a third party -- meaning city workers must staff the nursery.
	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	...
	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/no-more-trees-union-tells-city072320081&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/no-more-trees-union-tells-city072320081#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/michigan">Michigan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/public-sector-workers">Public Sector Workers</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:15:20 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nick Cote</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3130 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Union Accountant&#039;s Financial Analyses for New York Legislature Were &quot; A Step Above Voodoo . . .&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/conflict-interest-anyone-06042008</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The&lt;i&gt; New York Times&lt;/i&gt; has a devastating &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/03/nyregion/03actuary.html&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; up on the incestuous relationship between public sector union officials and the New York state legislature. The actual controversy is downright farcical: legislators relied on a public sector union accountant to determine the cost of proposed increases to the state&#039;s employee pension plan.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A reasonable observer might suggest that this arrangement represented a clear conflict of interest, but to New York state legislators it was just good book-keeping. According to the &lt;i&gt;Times&lt;/i&gt;, the union actuary &amp;quot;reviewed&amp;quot; hundreds of bills for the state before being exposed by the paper&#039;s investigation. What&#039;s more, the &lt;i&gt;Times&lt;/i&gt; reports that the actuary neglected to mention additional legislative costs of up $500 million in his original reports.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/conflict-interest-anyone-06042008&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/conflict-interest-anyone-06042008#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/new-york">New York</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/public-sector-workers">Public Sector Workers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/union-pension">Union Pension</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/union-political-activities">Union Political Activities</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:31:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Will Collins</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3083 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>No Tea Party</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/no-tea-party</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The coercive &amp;quot;card check&amp;quot; union organizing &lt;a href=&quot;/neutrality/&quot; title=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/neutrality/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;scheme&lt;/a&gt; became the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegram.com/article/20070928/NEWS/709280676/1116&quot; title=&quot;http://www.telegram.com/article/20070928/NEWS/709280676/1116&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;law&lt;/a&gt; of the land for public sector workers in Massachusetts yesterday.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bay State employees will undoubtedly find out soon that this abuse ridden scheme is no tea party. See all the latest about the National Right to Work Foundation&#039;s efforts to lessen the abuses suffered by workers under such drives &lt;a href=&quot;/b/nr_topics/topdown.php&quot; title=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/b/nr_topics/topdown.php&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/no-tea-party#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/card-check">Card Check</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/forced-unionism-states">Forced Unionism States</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/massachusetts">Massachusetts</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/public-sector-workers">Public Sector Workers</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 09:32:16 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Justin Hakes</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">63 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
