<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.nrtw.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Top Down Organizing</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/top-down-organizing</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Houston Nurses Derail Union Sham Election</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/houston-nurses-derail-union-sham-election-11112308</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
In another egregious example of Top Down union organizing, California Nurse Association (CNA) union officials and Tenet Medical Corporation &lt;a href=&quot;/en/press/2008/08/nurses-attack-backroom-deal&quot;&gt;attempted to corral unwilling nurses into union ranks by agreeing to forgo federal supervision during unionization elections&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
With free legal assistance from the National Right to Work Foundation, several nurses filed unfair labor practice charges with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). Now we learn that the NLRB has decided to put the sham &amp;quot;elections&amp;quot; on hold pending an official investigation into the charges. Here&#039;s an excerpt from the Foundation&#039;s press release:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/houston-nurses-derail-union-sham-election-11112308&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/houston-nurses-derail-union-sham-election-11112308#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/california-nurses-association">California Nurses Association</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/texas">Texas</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/top-down-organizing">Top Down Organizing</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:29:49 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Will Collins</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3248 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Foundation Action: Union Bosses, Co-Opted Hospital Scheme to Impose Union</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/foundation-action-union-bosses-co-opted-10082008</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
This &lt;a href=&quot;/files/nrtw/sept_oct_08v7_3and8.pdf&quot;&gt;story&lt;/a&gt; from the September/October issue of &lt;a href=&quot;/foundation-action/home.htm&quot;&gt;Foundation &lt;i&gt;Action&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; reports on the Foundation&#039;s efforts on behalf of two nurses who are suffering from a corrupt and illegal agreement between the California Nurses Association (CNA) union and their workplace to force nurses into CNA union ranks.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Read the whole story &lt;a href=&quot;/files/nrtw/sept_oct_08v7_3and8.pdf&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; (pdf) and sign up today for a &lt;a href=&quot;/foundation-action/home.htm&quot;&gt;free print subscription&lt;/a&gt;. To receive the entire issue via email, just type your email address into the box in the top right corner of this page.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/foundation-action-union-bosses-co-opted-10082008#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/cna">CNA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/foundation-action">Foundation Action</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/texas">Texas</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/top-down-organizing">Top Down Organizing</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 15:58:38 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3215 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>EXPOSED: Naked CNA Union Boss Hypocrisy</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/exposed-cna-union-boss-hypocrisy-08142008</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Union boss hypocrisy is nothing new, but &lt;a href=&quot;/press/2008/08/nurses-attack-backroom-deal&quot;&gt;this recent case&lt;/a&gt;, filed by two nurses in Houston, Texas against the CNA union and Tenet Healthcare shows just how blatant that hypocrisy can be.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
When the SEIU bosses got themselves a sweetheart deal to organize nurses from the top down with Catholic Healthcare Partners in Ohio, CNA/NNOC &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/12/us/12union.html?adxnnl=1&amp;amp;adxnnlx=1205337966-K8QfmZ52MfoNW4TAY1V5lA&quot;&gt;denounced&lt;/a&gt; the deal as an illegitimate sell out of workers’ rights to a free and fair election, and workers’ rights to choose or reject unionization with full information, and without coercion or discrimination:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Rose Ann DeMoro, executive director of the nurses association, condemned this [SEIU] agreement. She called it “a rigged scam” in which the service employees union would bargain only half-heartedly if it won the vote.
	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/exposed-cna-union-boss-hypocrisy-08142008&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/exposed-cna-union-boss-hypocrisy-08142008#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/cna">CNA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/neutrality-agreements">Neutrality Agreements</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/seiu">SEIU</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/texas">Texas</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/top-down-organizing">Top Down Organizing</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:03:09 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Patrick Semmens</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3159 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>UAW Officials Negotiating for Forced Dues</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/uaw-officials-negotiating-forced-dues</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;UAW union bosses are currently &lt;a href=&quot;http://detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070924/UPDATE/709240402&quot;&gt;threatening&lt;/a&gt; to order autoworkers at General Motors plants across the country off the job at 11 am. As per usual when union officials order strikes, expect &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtwc.org/blog/archives/166&quot;&gt;threats and/or violence&lt;/a&gt; against employees who wish to continue working to support their families.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But for all the media attention this strike will receive, one under-reported fact is that high on the list of UAW chief Ron Gettelfinger and the other top union officials’ list of demands is the ability to force nonunion employees into their forced unionism ranks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Youngstown, Ohio &lt;i&gt;Vindicator&lt;/i&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vindy.com/content/local_regional/318115348581118.php&quot;&gt;reported&lt;/a&gt; in late August that the ability to forcibly organize nonunion employees is a sticking point in negotiations all around the country:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;	In the current talks, Automotive News reported that UAW officials in Detroit are allowing GM assembly plants in Spring Hill, Tenn., and Lansing, Mich., to negotiate two-tier wage systems. Nonproduction workers would be paid roughly half as much as production workers. 	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	&lt;b&gt;In return, the UAW would organize nonunion suppliers&lt;/b&gt; that handle parts sequencing, building maintenance and nonproduction tasks, the trade publication said. 	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	Union sources reported that UAW officials around the country are considering such arrangements. 	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	 [emphasis added] 	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That negotiating demand was echoed again in a September 14th &lt;i&gt;Detroit News&lt;/i&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070914/OPINION01/709140313/1008/opinion01&quot;&gt;editorial&lt;/a&gt; that noted “the UAW is still holding to the position that it must have veto power over plant closings and contracts issued to nonunion suppliers in exchange for the other concessions.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So what do rank-and-file workers think of the fact that union officials are willing to make “concessions” just for the ability to swell their forced dues-paying ranks&#039; Sadly, many are probably unaware of the union officials’ self-serving demands.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But if they did know, their reaction might be like the one &lt;a href=&quot;/blog/card-check-bullying&quot;&gt;Mike Ivey&lt;/a&gt; had when he found out that UAW union officials were holding up a promised pay raise in an effort to force him and his coworkers into the UAW union.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/uaw-officials-negotiating-forced-dues&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/uaw-officials-negotiating-forced-dues#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/strikes">Strikes</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/top-down-organizing">Top Down Organizing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/uaw">UAW</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 10:55:47 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Patrick Semmens</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">51 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
