<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.nrtw.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Solicitor General</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/free-tagging/solicitor-general</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Union Lawyers Welcome U.S. Solicitor General To Their Legal Team in Locke Supreme Court Case</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/blog/union-lawyers-welcome-solicitor-general-073020089</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Yesterday, SCOTUSblog &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/workers-oppose-divided-argument-in-union-dispute/&quot;&gt;reported&lt;/a&gt; on the opposition by National Right to Work Foundation attorneys to  the Solicitor General&#039;s self-contradictory motion for divided arguments in the Foundation&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Locke v. Karass&lt;/i&gt; Supreme Court case. (For more background on the SG&#039;s unwelcome machinations and the Foundation&#039;s principled opposition, read &lt;a href=&quot;/blog/bush-administration-07302008&quot;&gt;this post&lt;/a&gt;.)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The SCOTUSblog post brings to light this new tidbit of news: &amp;quot;Jeremiah Collins, a lawyer for the respondent, said the union did not plan to file an opposition.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Of course he won&#039;t.  The Solicitor General is making Big Labor&#039;s legal arguments. Why not add another lawyer to the union legal team at taxpayer expense?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/blog/union-lawyers-welcome-solicitor-general-073020089&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/blog/union-lawyers-welcome-solicitor-general-073020089#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/free-tagging/locke">Locke</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/free-tagging/maine">Maine</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/free-tagging/seiu">SEIU</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/free-tagging/solicitor-general">Solicitor General</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/free-tagging/u-s-supreme-court">U.S. Supreme Court</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:24:27 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Patrick Semmens</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3146 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bush Administration -- Again -- Takes a Swipe at Employee Freedom</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/blog/bush-administration-07302008</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The Bush Administration is arguing Big Labor&#039;s legal positions in court again.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Right to Work supporters recall the Bush Administration&#039;s lousy record when it comes to employee free choice and worker freedom.  Solicitor General Paul Clement seemed to take pleasure in parroting union lawyer talking points in important legal proceedings like &lt;a href=&quot;/press/2007/06/u-s-supreme-court-rules-national-right-work-foundation-s-case-union-officials-have-no-&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Davenport v. Washington Education&lt;/i&gt; Association&lt;/a&gt;.  Before resigning in May, Clement &lt;a href=&quot;/blog/bushs-top-lawyer-taking-orders-big-labor&quot;&gt;took another swipe&lt;/a&gt; at employee freedom in &lt;i&gt;Locke v. Karass&lt;/i&gt;, another Foundation case going to the Supreme Court.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/blog/bush-administration-07302008&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/blog/bush-administration-07302008#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/free-tagging/bush">Bush</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/free-tagging/davenport">Davenport</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/free-tagging/locke">Locke</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/free-tagging/solicitor-general">Solicitor General</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:48:23 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stefan Gleason</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3142 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Administration Lawyer Undercuts Another Foundation Case, Abruptly Resigns</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/blog/administration-lawyer-undercuts-another-07012008</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The cover story of the July/August issue of Foundation &lt;i&gt;Action&lt;/i&gt; is now available for download &lt;a href=&quot;/files/nrtw/jul_aug_08_v5_coverstory.pdf&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The story details former United States Solicitor General Paul Clement&#039;s efforts to undermine the Foundation&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Locke v. Karass&lt;/i&gt; U.S. Supreme Court case. The article also shows that this isn&#039;t the first time that the Solicitor General, who recently-resigned his position, has undercut a Foundation Supreme Court case.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
You can get your own free subscription to Foundation &lt;i&gt;Action&lt;/i&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;/foundation-action/home.htm&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/blog/administration-lawyer-undercuts-another-07012008#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/free-tagging/foundation-action">Foundation Action</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/free-tagging/locke">Locke</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/free-tagging/solicitor-general">Solicitor General</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 12:47:14 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Patrick Semmens</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3109 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Solicitor General Paul Clement Resigns; But Not Soon Enough</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/blog/solicitor-general-clement-resigns-right-work-advocates-breath-sigh-relief</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Solicitor General Paul Clement &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bostonherald.com/news/national/politics/general/view.bg?articleid=1094054&amp;amp;srvc=home&amp;amp;position=recent&quot;&gt;resigned&lt;/a&gt; yesterday after seven years with the Bush Administration.  As reported by Tony Mauro on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2008/05/praise-and-crit.html&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Legal Times&lt;/i&gt; blog&lt;/a&gt;, Right to Work advocates are thrilled to see him go:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;quot;Paul Clement did not leave soon enough,&amp;quot; said Stefan Gleason, vice president of the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation in a statement. &amp;quot;He kicked the cause of employee freedom from compulsory unionism in the teeth once again before heading out the door.&amp;quot;
	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/blog/solicitor-general-clement-resigns-right-work-advocates-breath-sigh-relief&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/blog/solicitor-general-clement-resigns-right-work-advocates-breath-sigh-relief#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/free-tagging/bush">Bush</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/free-tagging/solicitor-general">Solicitor General</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/free-tagging/u-s-supreme-court">U.S. Supreme Court</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 12:23:09 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Will Collins</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3066 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Is Bush&#039;s Top Lawyer Taking Orders from Big Labor?</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/blog/bushs-top-lawyer-taking-orders-big-labor</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
U.S. Solicitor General Paul Clement, the Bush administration&#039;s top lawyer, has just inflicted more damage on America&#039;s working men and women laboring under compulsory unionism. Does President Bush even know what his administration&#039;s lawyer is doing?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This week, the too-clever-by-half lawyer filed a brief in the National Right to Work Foundation&#039;s latest pending U.S. Supreme Court case, &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/press/2008/02/u-s-supreme-court-re-examine-scope-union-dues-compelled-non-union-workers&quot;&gt;Locke v. Karass&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, and has taken a position that surely must please the union bosses. The High Court in &lt;i&gt;Locke &lt;/i&gt;will examine the criteria for determining how much non-union members must pay to a union where they do not enjoy the fundamental protection of a Right to Work law.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/blog/bushs-top-lawyer-taking-orders-big-labor&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/blog/bushs-top-lawyer-taking-orders-big-labor#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/free-tagging/bush">Bush</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/free-tagging/forced-dues">Forced Dues</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/free-tagging/maine">Maine</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/free-tagging/solicitor-general">Solicitor General</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/free-tagging/supreme-court">Supreme Court</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/free-tagging/u-s-supreme-court">U.S. Supreme Court</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 16:25:04 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stefan Gleason</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3063 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
