<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.nrtw.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Foster Parents</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/foster-parents</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>California Seeks to One-Up Washington State by Forcibly Unionizing Grandmas</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/california-seeks-one-washington-state-unionizing-grandma</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Following up on &lt;a href=&quot;/blog/forced-union-dues-foster-parents&quot;&gt;forced dues for foster parents&lt;/a&gt; in Washington State, another &lt;a href=&quot;http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/353039_weibtraubonline29.html&quot;&gt;op-ed&lt;/a&gt; in the Seattle P-I this week says that the California Legislature wants to &amp;quot;unionize Grandma.&amp;quot;  The article states:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	A bill pending in the Senate would create a union to organize family&lt;br /&gt;
	members who provide child care for their kin and are paid by the state&lt;br /&gt;
	so that mothers can work outside the home.
	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Furthermore:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Child-care providers who did not want to join the union would still&lt;br /&gt;
	have to pay fees -- likely in the same amount as the union dues.
	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
 Most disturbingly, this extension of compulsory unionism is part of a broader trend:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	The move in California is part of a nationwide strategy by SEIU and the&lt;br /&gt;
	American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees. Since&lt;br /&gt;
	2005, governors in eight states have issued executive orders or taken&lt;br /&gt;
	other action giving family child-care providers the right to unionize&lt;br /&gt;
	and bargain as a group.
	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
And in all of those states without a &lt;a href=&quot;/rtws.htm&quot;&gt;Right to Work law&lt;/a&gt;, those care providers must pay union dues.   What a tell tale sign that this is all about the money that union officials must stoop to compelling payment of union dues from people taking care of their own families. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/california-seeks-one-washington-state-unionizing-grandma&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/california-seeks-one-washington-state-unionizing-grandma#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/california">California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/child-care">Child Care</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/forced-dues">Forced Dues</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/forced-unionism-states">Forced Unionism States</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/foster-parents">Foster Parents</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/washington-state">Washington State</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:48:33 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Justin Hakes</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3005 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Forced Union Dues for Foster Parents?</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/forced-union-dues-foster-parents</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
You heard it right.  According to an &lt;a href=&quot;http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/352627_foster26.html&quot;&gt;op-ed&lt;/a&gt; just run by the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Washington State is considering subjecting foster parents within the state to compulsory unionism, which could cause some serious problems.  The piece cites:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	If forced to join, I predict foster parents already fed up with the&lt;br /&gt;
	system will depart in droves. If even 20 percent leave already thin&lt;br /&gt;
	ranks, it will be a foster care disaster.
	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The author also brands the idea as a &amp;quot;beachhead,&amp;quot; and that:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Once a precedent is set, it will be easy to expand the scope because virtually all children in foster care are special needs.
	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Sounds like union officials in Washington are &lt;a href=&quot;/blog/imposition-forced-union-dues-dirty-deal&quot;&gt;once again&lt;/a&gt; using the legislature to expand their special privileges rather than soliciting voluntary support of those they seek to organize.  Not to mention the fact that these are foster parents we&#039;re talking about here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/forced-union-dues-foster-parents&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/forced-union-dues-foster-parents#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/forced-dues">Forced Dues</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/forced-unionism-states">Forced Unionism States</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/foster-care">Foster Care</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/foster-parents">Foster Parents</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/washington-state">Washington State</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:42:41 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Justin Hakes</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3002 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
