Employee Free Choice Act

Card Check Forced Unionism: Biggest Intervention Since New Deal?

Nick Cote — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:10:34 -0400

Big Labor apologist Mark Weisbrot had a piece defending the woefully misnamed Employee Free Choice Act in Tuesday's Chicago Sun-Times. Money quote (emphasis mine):

This law would probably change Americans' lives more than any legislation since the New Deal brought us Social Security. The political influence of millions of new union members would also bring us closer to such basic reforms as universal health care. It's all long overdue.

Of course, millions of new forced dues paying union members would only increase union bosses' influence, not the workers' influence -- nearly half of whom do not support Big Labor's political agenda.

Steelworkers Union President Continues Using Todd Palin's Money to Bash His Wife

Will Collins — Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:57:07 -0400

Two days ago, we posted an entry announcing our offer of free legal aid to Todd Palin if he wishes to stop funding ugly union attacks against his wife. It continues -- the USW's president recently unloaded on Governor Palin and her family at the union's official blog:

At the press conference, Palin trotted him out, stressing his steelworker credentials. Here’s a good union man, she emphasized.

But his United Steelworker card doesn’t include an automatic auxiliary membership for her. Or her running mate at the top of the Republican ticket...

read more

Another Card-Check Myth Debunked

Will Collins — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:36:18 -0400

The National Association of Manufacturer's 'Shopfloor' blog has post up on another oft-repeated card-check myth. The entry starts out with Big Labor's favorite rejoinder to critics of the erroneously-titled "Employee Free Choice Act" (EFCA):

The most-common misleading response from organized labor to the criticism that the Employee Free Choice Act will destroy the secret ballot in the workplace goes like…well, here’s a recent example. It comes from Bill McCarthy, president of the Minneapolis Regional Labor Federation.

. . .

"The EFCA would give workers, not employers, the right to decide how to express the choice about going union: through the card-check process OR through the NLRB election process."

read more

Quick Hits -- June 1, 2008

Will Collins — Mon, 02 Jun 2008 11:25:14 -0400

A few Right to Work-related updates from over the weekend:

Kennedy: Having no election is "Simple and Fair"

Justin Hakes — Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:34:19 -0400

Senator Ted Kennedy responds to the Wall Street Journal's recent piece that among other things, exposed the coercive nature of "card check" union organizing. He brands the process "simple and fair," but maybe he should watch the video below, which we posted a few weeks back. The only thing simple about such campaigns is how unfair to employees they are. Read more in this letter to the editor from today.

BLS Report: In-Your-Face "Card Check" Organizing Pays Off for Union Officials

Justin Hakes — Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:38:14 -0500

Today's report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics confirms that efforts to sweep more workers into unionization through coercive "card check" organizing are paying off for union officials.

However, if Congress resurrects and passes mandatory "card check" legislation, workers will have even less say over whether they are unionized. Union officials will unleash a tidal wave of in-your-face organizing drives on America's workers, and potentially millions more will be corralled into dues-paying union ranks.

It Is For Unions, Period.

John Powell — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 10:51:56 -0500

The readers’ forum section in West Virginia’s Charleston Gazette featured a great commentary from one local reader about the so-called “Employee Free Choice Act,” a bill that would lead to even more union intimidation during organizing drives. The following was his response after one AFL-CIO union boss claimed that “employees are not being allowed to join unions.”

“The Employee Free Choice Act is not for employees. It is for unions, period. Under that proposed act, unions can get employees signed up on union cards, even in a pizza parlor after three beers, before three or four other pushy union officials.”

For more information about in-your-face card check schemes, read these studies conducted by the National Institute for Labor Relations Research.

The Card Check Sucker Punch

John Powell — Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:13:50 -0500

Following up on last week’s post on Big Labor’s push for mandating coercive “card check” organizing, the New York Post had a great article about the dangers of the so-called “Employee Free Choice Act.”

Tim Miller wrote this after one presidential hopeful promised to go “10 rounds with anybody” in order to help union officials:

“EFCA would strip employees of the right to a secret ballot vote, and make it much easier for union organizers to push employees into union membership - which in turn means more dollars for labor leaders.

In other words, ‘going 10 rounds with anybody’ involves sucker-punching working Americans.”

Couldn’t have said it better myself.

Secret Ballots? Who Needs ‘Em?

John Powell — Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:20:42 -0500

As union chief John Sweeney continues to whine over the National Labor Relations Board’s recent workers’ rights victories, Big Labor bosses are meeting with Democrat officials today to press for passage of the horribly misnamed “Employee Free Choice Act.”

The Wall Street Journal covered the story, stating that labor officials from around the world have convened in Washington as part of a global push to make it easier for unions to corral workers into union ranks by imposing the “card check” instant organizing scam.

The card check instant organizing process is opposed by most Americans because it curtails employees’ freedom to choose whether or not to unionize and strips workers of the limited protections of a government-supervised secret ballot election.

For more information about the harmful affects of in-your-face card check schemes on employees, check out these studies conducted by the National Institute for Labor Relations Research.