What do union bosses do when independent-minded employees refuse to succumb to union organizing pressure?
Well, it turns out Jimmy Hoffa’s solution is to write a letter [1] to the president of the companies he is trying to organize in order to smear those companies.
Teamsters boss Hoffa did just that in writing to CEO [2] Moir Lockhead once FirstGroup employees began showing admirable resistance to the union's thuggish organizing tactics.
Workers at a Hodgkins, Illinois busing facility – owned by the UK-based FirstGroup – are saying “no” to the Teamsters’ unionization hopes, but union bosses don't like hearing "no" from independent-minded employees.
Hoffa's letter underscores the problems with so-called “neutrality agreements,” [3] since FirstGroup entered into such an agreement with the Teamsters union in order to get the union off its back. Neutrality agreements [4] give unions sweeping access to employees’ personal information and ban secret-ballot elections, since the employer agrees to support a union’s attempt to organize its workforce.
Hoffa’s letter shows that anything short of unyielding assistance to lock employees up in forced unionism by employers is unacceptable to union officials.
In a similar Right to Work Foundation-aided case in Batavia, Illinois [5], another union with a neutrality pledge refused to go away from a FirstGroup facility – just like what is happening here.
Links:
[1] http://www.nrtw.org/files/nrtw/HoffaLettertoFirstGroup.pdf
[2] http://www.nrtw.org/files/nrtw/HoffaLettertoFirstGroup.pdf
[3] http://www.nrtw.org/neutrality/na_1.htm
[4] http://www.nrtw.org/neutrality/na_1.htm
[5] http://www.nrtw.org/no-means-no