<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.nrtw.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Idaho</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/idaho</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Truck Drivers and Dockworkers Fight Back Against Teamster Union Intimidation</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/truck-drivers-and-dockworkers-fight-back-03052109</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: center&quot;&gt;
&lt;img src=&quot;/i/newsrelease.png&quot; alt=&quot;News Release&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;457&quot; height=&quot;48&quot; /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;h2 style=&quot;text-align: center&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/en/press/2009/03/truck-drivers-and-dockworkers-fight-back-03052009&quot; title=&quot;Truck Drivers and Dockworkers Fight Back Against Teamster Union Intimidation&quot;&gt;Truck Drivers and Dockworkers Fight Back Against Teamster Union Intimidation&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;h3 style=&quot;text-align: center; font-style: italic&quot;&gt;Employees seek to throw out union after union bosses’ ugly campaign of harassment and coercion&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Seattle, Washington (March 5, 2009)&lt;/b&gt; — Employees from nine collective bargaining units of Oak Harbor Freight Lines, Inc. have filed decertification petitions seeking elections to oust the Teamster union as the workers’ monopoly bargaining agent.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/truck-drivers-and-dockworkers-fight-back-03052109&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/truck-drivers-and-dockworkers-fight-back-03052109#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/harassment">Harassment</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/idaho">Idaho</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/national-right-work-legal-defense-foundation">National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/oregon">Oregon</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/strike">Strike</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/teamsters">Teamsters</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/union-intimidation">Union Intimidation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/washington-state">Washington State</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 12:05:57 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3366 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>U.S. Supreme Court Agrees With Right to Work Foundation: Unions Have No Right to Payroll Deduction</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/us-supreme-court-agrees-with-nrtw-02242009</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: center&quot;&gt;
&lt;img src=&quot;/i/newsrelease.png&quot; alt=&quot;News Release&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;457&quot; height=&quot;48&quot; /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;h2 style=&quot;text-align: center&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/en/press/2009/02/us-supreme-court-agrees-with-nrtw-02242109&quot; title=&quot;U.S. Supreme Court Agrees With Right to Work Foundation: Unions Have No Right to Payroll Deduction&quot;&gt;U.S. Supreme Court Agrees With Right to Work Foundation: Unions Have No Right to Payroll Deduction&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;h3 style=&quot;text-align: center; font-style: italic&quot;&gt;More effective alternative would have been stopping government payroll deduction for all union dues&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Washington, DC (February 24, 2009)&lt;/b&gt; — The U.S. Supreme Court today ruled 6-3 in Ysursa v. Pocatello Education Association that states may prohibit union officials from using payroll deduction to divert government workers’ money into union coffers.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/us-supreme-court-agrees-with-nrtw-02242009&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/us-supreme-court-agrees-with-nrtw-02242009#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/davenport">Davenport</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/forced-dues-politics">Forced Dues for Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/idaho">Idaho</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/national-right-work-foundation">National Right to Work Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/national-right-work-legal-defense-foundation">National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/u-s-supreme-court">U.S. Supreme Court</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/union-politics">Union Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/washington-dc">Washington DC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/ysursa">Ysursa</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:27:53 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3358 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Foundation Urges Supreme Court to Uphold Ban on Payroll Deductions for Politics</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/foundation-files-amicus-brief-pocatello-06122008</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
In March, at the &lt;a href=&quot;/Pocatello&quot;&gt;urging&lt;/a&gt; of the National Right to Work Foundation, the U.S. Supreme Court took up &lt;i&gt;Ysursa v. Pocatello Education Association&lt;/i&gt;. Now the Foundation has jointly filed an &lt;i&gt;amicus curiae&lt;/i&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;/files/nrtw/Pocatello-Amicus.pdf&quot;&gt;brief&lt;/a&gt; (pdf) in the case.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The High Court is reviewing a ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit that says that Idaho&#039;s state law banning payroll deductions for union political expenditures (narrowly defined) can not apply to payroll deductions at the local government level. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
As the Foundation&#039;s brief explains, the Ninth Circuit&#039;s ruling wrongly forces Idaho taxpayers to subsidize union political activities by offering valuable payroll deduction services to union officials.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/foundation-files-amicus-brief-pocatello-06122008&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/foundation-files-amicus-brief-pocatello-06122008#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/idaho">Idaho</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/pocatello">Pocatello</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/u-s-supreme-court">U.S. Supreme Court</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:28:22 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Patrick Semmens</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3093 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&quot;Paycheck Protection&quot; Regulation Nixed</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/paycheck-protection-regulation-nixed</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Another so-called &amp;quot;paycheck protection&amp;quot; campaign finance regulation has been &lt;a href=&quot;http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/6420AP_ID_Political_Deductions.html&#039;source=rss&quot;&gt;struck down&lt;/a&gt; in federal court. (A similar law has been struck down in Utah.) &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070629/EDITORIAL/106290012/1013/EDITORIAL&quot;&gt;noted&lt;/a&gt; by former Federal Election Commission chair Brad Smith in The Washington Times in the wake of the Right to Work Foundation&#039;s defensive &lt;a href=&quot;/b/nr_648.php&quot;&gt;victory&lt;/a&gt; at the U.S. Supreme Court in June, such regulations are both bad policy and bad politics. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/paycheck-protection-regulation-nixed#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/idaho">Idaho</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/paycheck-protection">Paycheck Protection</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/right-work-states">Right to Work States</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/utah">Utah</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 11:21:33 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Justin Hakes</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">87 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
