News Release

Union Bosses Levy Retaliatory Strike Fine Against Worker After Telling Him to Continue Working During Strike

Worker fined over $7,300 for exercising his right to refrain from formal union membership

Kansas City, MO (May 9, 2012) – A Honeywell nuclear assembly worker has filed a federal charge against a local union for retaliating against him with a $7,361.36 fine for exercising his right to refrain from union membership and continue to do his job during a union boss-instigated strike.

With free legal assistance from National Right to Work Foundation attorneys, Daniel Gudde filed the charge with the National Labor Relations Board regional office in Overland Park, Kansas on Friday.

Gudde began working at Honeywell in late September believing he had to join the International Association of Machinist (IAM) Local Lodge 778 union. In early October, IAM Local 778 union officials instigated a strike. Gudde and three of his coworkers were unsure if they had to go on strike as union members or if they had to fulfill a required 30 day probationary period of employment.

Union officials told Gudde and his colleagues to continue to work to complete the 30 day probationary period. After the probationary period, union bosses obligated Gudde and his coworkers to leave their jobs at the nuclear facility. Union members bound by the union's constitution and bylaws can be fined for continuing to work during a strike.

After the 30 day period, Gudde learned of his right to resign from full dues paying union membership at any time. He notified the IAM union hierarchy that he was resigning from formal union membership when his 30 day period ended and returned to work after a couple of days. Workers who refrain from union membership are not subject to a union's constitution and bylaws and cannot be fined or otherwise disciplined for working during a strike.

However, because Missouri does not have a Right to Work law, Gudde is still forced to pay a certain amount of union dues and fees to the union.

In mid-March, IAM union bosses fined Gudde $7,361.36 for working during the strike. Moreover, three coworkers who did not resign from the union but also worked during the 30 day probation period were not fined, thus suggesting the fine was in retaliation for Gudde exercising his rights.

"Cynical IAM union bosses are retaliating against a worker for exercising his rights to continue providing for himself and his family during a strike, even after they told him to keep working," said Mark Mix, President of the National Right to Work Foundation. "These types of compulsory unionism injustices will continue to occur until Missouri passes Right to Work protections for its workers."

The National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation is a nonprofit, charitable organization providing free legal aid to employees whose human or civil rights have been violated by compulsory unionism abuses. The Foundation, which can be contacted toll-free at 1-800-336-3600, is assisting thousands of employees in over 200 cases nationwide.

Comments

It's in the bi-laws he agreed too!

You said it yourselve. The union allowed him to work through his 30 probation, and then informed him that he must refrain from work during a strike. He didn't adhere to the bi-laws set forth by workers before him, that he agreed too. He was fined for disregarding the strike. The other workers finished out their probation and adhered to the strike until it was over. The strike has ended and the workers are back making nuclear parts, due to the union workers sticking together they were able to maintain a good living wage and retain what was promised to the retirees. I forgot to mention the Honeywell plant is in the process of moving to a new plant and guess what it is Grandview, Missouri a NON-Right To Work for Less State. Guess your claims that companies prefer you RTW state is just a "joke". Considering this plant was located only a few mile from Kansas which is a RTW state and decided to move farther into a NON-RTW. Thanks to MO congress for realizing reducing workers wages only reduces state funds and value of life for the middle class workers. Thanks to our MO congress RTW has been pushed aside again this year.

So apparently reading

So apparently reading comprehension isn't your strong suit, Roofer, as you apparently missed an entire paragraph which stated that he properly followed the bylaws and opted OUT of the union when he found out he was able to do so. Therefore, he was no longer subject to their bylaws or their strike when he went back to work.

Reading is fundamental.

Opt. out?

Yea being from Kansas City I know there are some key points and dates missing from this article. I don't believe everything I read, obviously you do. I have a nice beach front property in Kansas for cheap, would you like to buy it? He worked past the probation period while he was still a member, which is a clear violation of bi-laws in which he signed up for.

What paragraph stats he

What paragraph stats he worked past the probation period? If you're going to take the time to comment on something, perhaps you should pay attention to the article you're reading. It clearly stats he NOTIFIED THE UNION THAT HE WOULD BE OPTING OUT ONCE HIS 30 DAY PROBATION PERIOD WAS UP.

Head out of the toilet

Hey get your head out of the toilet. I stated that I don't believe everything I read from this website. These stories are full of holes. Like I said it is easy for them to say he opted out once his 30 day probation was up. But like anything else they show no proof and their claims are hearsey. If he opted out at the right time then he has nothing to worry about, he will not have to pay. By the way if he is quiting the union then why is he worried about a fine. The money he is fined will only be required if he was to stay in the union, but no worries he quit. He can get a better paying job, o wait he thought the union would lose and he would be given kudos for standing up against the UNION from the company. NOT, the strike was ended by great representation and now he's mad because he quit the union LATE and acquired a fine which he will pay if he wants to work at Honeywell. Honeywell understands the value of paying decent wages to acquire decent workers. They are in the process of moving their facility, but it still is in MO a proud non-RTW state. Funny thing is it is only miles from the Kansas border the unpopular RTW state. And they used all union contractors to build and move the new plant to Grandview. Being from Kansas City and talking to certain individuals I now can see with my own eyes how these articles like to push their agenda by reveiling their half of the story, ONLY.

Propaganda from big business that hates the little man.

The article states
"However, because Missouri does not have a Right to Work law, Gudde is still forced to pay a certain amount of union dues and fees to the union."
Forced by who? The employer (private company)? The union (private group)? So this 'right to work' organization wants to get Government involved (by making a law) with a deal made between a private group, and a private company? That is totalitarianism, for the benefit of businesses that want to change the free market to their advantage, at the expense of the tax payer.


Terms of Web Site Use      Related Links: National Right to Work Committee | National Institute for Labor Relations Research

Copyright © 2010 National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation
 National Right to Work Legal Defense and Education Foundation, Inc.
8001 Braddock Road / Springfield, Virginia 22160
(703) 321-8510 | (800) 336-3600 / (703) 321-9613 fax - general (703) 321-9319 fax - legal department