Indiana Workers File Brief in Support of State’s New Right to Work Law
Hoosier citizens contest spurious union legal challenge
Lake County, IN (May 7, 2012) – Two Indiana citizens, David Brubaker and Douglas Richards, have just submitted an amicus curiae brief to defend Indiana’s newly-enacted Right to Work law from a frivolous union legal challenge in state court.
Brubaker and Richards are both clients of National Right to Work Foundation staff attorneys. To comply with Indiana bar and court rules, the Foundation engaged Indiana attorneys Asheesh Agarwal and David Wagner of the Indianapolis office of Ogletree Deakins to file the workers’ amicus brief.
The anti-Right to Work lawsuit, filed by United Steel Workers (USW) lawyers in April, makes a number of dubious claims about Indiana’s new law, including the argument that unions have a right to force workers to pay for their unwanted services.
Both Brubaker and Richards are employed in workplaces where a forced dues contract remains in place between their employers and the USW. Consequently, both workers are still forced to pay union dues just to keep their jobs, despite the fact neither belongs to the union nor sought the union’s so-called “representation.”
Although Indiana’s recently-enacted Right to Work law states that no employee can be required to pay union dues as a condition of employment, forced dues contracts between unions and employers entered into prior to the effective date of the law remain in force throughout the state.
According to Brubaker and Richards, monopoly bargaining agreements that force nonunion employees to subsidize union activities – such as the agreements both workers are currently subject to – infringe on their First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and freedom of association. Brubaker and Richards have no desire to affiliate with the USW union or contribute financially to union activities, and Indiana’s new Right to Work law frees them from those obligations as soon as their employers’ old contracts with the USW union expire.
“Hoosier citizens want to make their voices heard against a frivolous union legal challenge to Indiana’s new Right to Work law,” said Patrick Semmens, legal information director for the National Right to Work Foundation. “Workers shouldn’t be forced to join or pay tribute to a union just to keep a job, which is why we applaud David Brubaker and Douglas Richards for standing up for their rights in state court.”
Comments
Pay your share
The sad thing is the union will still have to offer these employees the benefits,wages, and representation that they have fought to establish for their members. Only catch is these two will not be paying there fair share to run the pension fund and health care fund while still being allowed to use these benefits that so many others are paying for. These two are just looking for some more handouts from the working class citizen. I agree they probably were cornered by someone who signs their pay check, or someone who has lined their pockets to try and attract the greater masses. This tactic is used by employers and lobbyist to destroy working class wages. Right to work laws are being pushed by CEO's, corporate dogs, and lobbyist who are trying to fool us that we are being forced to fund "unions". The only thing this law will do is destroy unions and then allow these so-called job makers to lower your wages and benefits. Who will stop them, if you stand alone you will be FIRED.
Re: pay your share
No, the union does NOT...
"still have to offer these employees the benefits,wages, and representation that they have fought to establish for their members"
The union could, at any time, choose to drop "sole representative" status (decertify) and only REPRESENT THOSE WHO ARE MEMBERS! Of course, they would lose certain privileges by doing so (number one of which would be the requirement that employers being FORCED to "bargain" with them), but it's entirely possible. Likely? No...because unions are riding on the backs of those who normally would NOT choose to be members. They (the unions) are using THEIR coerced "membership" to carry through policies that normal non-members don't care to have anything to do with.
As for the claim of....
"This tactic is used by employers and lobbyist to destroy working class wages"
..it occurs to me that the biggest "destroyers" of "working class wages" have been the union, with their seemingly systematic destruction of the companies that would PAY such wages. Perhaps it hasn't occurred to them yet that wages - ANY wages! - is better than no wages at all, which is what the unions have had to offer the BULK of their membership over the last 40 years.
In that period, the defining characteristic of union membership has been job loss. Look at union membership during the period in question; the unions have squandered literally MILLIONS of their members jobs.
Think that's a "benefit"?????
Wrong again!
Hey Ken this is not Barbie land. In Missouri we make twice as much as the non-union, and we stay competitive by being more productive through training. I receive a wealth of benefits too. It is true union membership has struggled, but with anything that has been around for over a 100 years there will be high points and low points. It is true we have less members and which only proves that there are options besides working for a union and nothing is forced. My union will never be shipped over seas, it's impossible to send a building to get roofed over seas. And you are definitely wrong that any wage is better than no wage. I dare you to go work commercial roofing for minimum or less, which is what I find everyday, and then tell me any wage is a good wage. Being on the top 5 list for dangerous jobs in the country and your saying we should be happy to put our lives at risk for $8 an hour, get real. Must be nice to live in "Barbie's Land".
Paid signers of the "No Rights At Work" amicus brief
This is a laugh - two workers' file amicus brief in support of "No Rights At Work" amicus brif.
Everyone is laughing! Do you really think that anyone thinks that these two unknowing working hands have any idea of what they have been sucked into? I don't.
I know how it works. A company corners a couple of workers and tells them that they need them to sign a document saying they support the implementation of a "No Rights At Work" law. Since the employees are afraid of losing their jobs - they signed.
Now these two are realizing that they have sold out the interest of all workers in the state, but what can they do. I'm sure they have families to feed. So, even if they wanted to correct their action and have their names removed from a document that could cost every worker in Indiana an average of $450 per month!
I'm hopeful, that even if this lawsuit fails that the people of Indiana will vote out this "No Rights At Work" action.
Defending worker rights
No one should be forced to join a union as a condition of employment. No worker needs to be coerced into filing a lawsuit when unions are trying to take away worker's fundamental right of voluntary association. It is the unions that have sold out the interests of the workers by forcing them to pay dues to a union that they may not want to join. Richard Slawson, it is obvious that you are just a union hack, not constrained by the facts.
Half truths again.
No one is forced to join a union. It's a America and your free to work where you want. Yes people unions only make up 10% of all available jobs. So anyone with common math skills can see that there are 90% more jobs that are not union. Guess what you can actually work at one of these non-union companies, it's America. O wait a majority of those other jobs have no competitive wages, benefits, apprenticeship programs, death benefits, and pensions that carry over to you relatives.
Middle class view?
I could only imagine that someone from NRTWLDF, is bloging to try and add a middle class perspective, FUNNY. It actually sounds like the tone and word choice that is used by the hack Mark "the shark" Mixer. Coincidence, I think not.