I would say that from one

I would say that from one perspective if the companies had the ability to hire part time nonunion employees the odds of hiring new people would increase greatly. Most companies would prefer to stay out of that situation as there is ample education out there that it is a poor long term solution. If they were able to decrease labor costs 10% they could hire 10% more workers and gain efficencies for the same amount of money without laying anyone off and taking a large part of their local population off of unemployment releasing major stresses on local government. I would also ask... What kind of life would your friend have if his union didn't bend to the increasing pressures of the current financial market and General Mills had to make the financial decision to relocate to Mexico and increase profits 30%

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <div> <br> <b> <i> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options


Terms of Web Site Use      Related Links: National Right to Work Committee | National Institute for Labor Relations Research

Copyright © 2010 National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation
 National Right to Work Legal Defense and Education Foundation, Inc.
8001 Braddock Road / Springfield, Virginia 22160
(703) 321-8510 | (800) 336-3600 / (703) 321-9613 fax - general (703) 321-9319 fax - legal department