I fail to see the justice in compelling employees to accept an unwanted intermediary to deal with their employer. This is especially true when said intermediary has an unenviable record for corruption and misuse of resources. Just look at the landmark United States Supreme Court case Communications Workers v. Beck. In that case it was found that the Communications Workers of America could account for only 21% of the money that it supposedly used for the benefit of its members.

The arrogance of this advocate for compulsory unionism is stunning.

Bismarck