I have read Michael's paper, in fact I even contacted him about it (I am not certain but I do not think you spoke with him) Here is a quote from Mike himself, "I saw the NRTW blog posting yesterday. Clearly, It misstates my personal position as well as the thrust of the paper's argument as a whole. " If you were to include the papers true intention then you could have posted an accurate editorial. I am hoping that anyone who reads the posts here take the time to research the accuracy of every post. I am curious about the misleading article and wonder how many others are done the same way. Can right to work stand on its own merits or is there an underlying reason for your support. Could it be that eliminating unions is the focus and supposedly supporting workers rights is the vehicle.